The Children’s Ground approach is underpinned by research and experience and is tracked through a 25-year longitudinal evaluation

With a comprehensive Research & Evaluation Framework, Children’s Ground aims to evidence the impact of the Children’s Ground Approach in creating change with children, families and communities and informing national systems and policy change.
A 25-Year Longitudinal Evaluation
Through a longitudinal evaluation and strategic and community level research agendas, we are monitoring and measuring change in education, health and wellbeing, economic, social and cultural outcomes – over the short, medium and long-term.
Our evaluation has Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) approval and is guided and overseen by a national Research Advisory Group, consisting of experts in child development, health and wellbeing, family wellbeing, systems research and community-led research and development.

Community Governance, culturally responsive and strength-based
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been the subjects of research and evaluation in different forms since colonisation. Almost always, this research involved collecting data from people and taking it away to be analysed, with no direct benefit for the individuals or communities involved and no feedback on the outcomes of the research.
Children’s Ground’s monitoring, evaluation and research is governed by First Nations people. It is the community that co-designs, executes, analyses and reports on the outcomes for their community.
+ Learn MoreChildren’s Ground’s Research & Evaluation Framework
Children’s Ground is guided by Participatory Action Research (PAR): ‘a systematic investigation, with the collaboration of those affected by the issue being studied, for the purposes of education and taking action or effecting social change. PAR centres on community strengths and issues and explicitly engages those who live in the community in the research process.’
However, traditional outcome measures relating to users are often focused on deficit, disease and death. While these indicators are important, they can undermine or fail to recognise strength-based indicators critical to shifting ultimate wellbeing when assessed on their own.
At Children’s Ground, we define key indicators with the community to ensure both culture and strength are embedded and recognised in progress measures and outcomes indicators.
Our Approach is broken into five-yearly strategic development plans and annual progress indicators. These inform a comprehensive evaluation report every three years. Over time, we are evaluating the quality and impact of our work across outcomes for children, families and communities, as well as processes in system, service and practice reform and change.
Our Monitoring and Evaluation framework consists of nine long-term outcomes for children, their families and the community. Each of these has short and medium-term indicators that are the building blocks of long-term change. This will allow us to report back to the community, our investors and partners, and will build an evidence base for an approach to achieving equity, inclusion and addressing extreme disadvantage over the long-term.
A high degree of innovation and responsiveness is embedded within our evaluation approaches so that evidencing the Children’s Ground Approach is shaped by each community for their children, families and local context. We draw on both Western and First Nations approaches to monitoring and evaluation.
- Close
Decades of evidence confirms that the greatest return on investment in social and economic terms is achieved by starting early with children (before school age) and responding to all key social and cultural determinants of health, wellbeing and life.
Our impact can only be truly understood over a generation – when the generation of children growing up with Children’s Ground are young adults and become the majority of families who have experienced positive education, health and cultural learning and wellbeing from their earliest years; when they have had a voice and agency over their own lives and have experienced lifelong inclusion and equity in education, health, social and economic life.
- Close
Evaluation Reports
Analyses impact against the Evaluation Framework as part of the longitudinal evaluation.
read more